February 26, 2013

Cover Letter Samples


Cover Letter Samples

See sample cover letters and thank-you notes that are appropriate to send to nonprofit employers.

Not sure how to sell yourself for the job? Check out this sample cover letter for a sales job.

Could your cover-letter writing skills use some extra help? If so, get ideas from this sample cover letter for an elementary school teacher.

Stumped on how to write a cover letter that will catch an employer's attention? Get ideas from this sample.

You don't want your cover letter to read like the code you write. Get some inspiration from this sample cover letter.

Your cover letter can address your unemployment situation while still playing up your experience and accomplishments. Get some ideas from this sample.

Ever wanted to write a glowing letter of recommendation but weren't sure what it should look like? Here's an example.

Cover letters should vary depending on the opportunity and your experience, but this example will get you started.

Going for a job as a pharmacy technician? Be sure to use your cover letter to convey your experience and training. Get ideas from this sample.

This sample cover letter for an investment banker conveys the candidate's qualifications and achievements.


Sample Resumes by Industry

Want to be the standout job candidate in your field? Then writing a resume that highlights your industry-specific experience, accomplishments and credentials is essential. If you need help customizing your resume to your field, check out these examples of resumes for various careers and career levels in the following industries:
  

 Sales 


Step-by-Step Guide to Negotiating a Great Salary


Step-by-Step Guide to Negotiating a Great Salary

Here's a secret: Employers rarely make their best offer first, and job candidates who negotiate generally earn much more than those who don't. And a well-thought-out negotiation makes you look like a stronger candidate -- and employee. 
"We found that those people who attempted to negotiate their salary in a constructive way are perceived as more favorable than those who didn't negotiate at all, because they were demonstrating the skills the company wanted to hire them for," says Robin Pinkley, coauthor of Get Paid What You're Worth and an associate professor of strategy and entrepreneurship at Southern Methodist University's Cox School of Business.
You can start laying the groundwork for your salary negotiation even before the first interview. Here's a step-by-step guide:
During the Interview Process

  • Do Your Research: Before the interview, learn about the company's salary ranges and benefits as well as industry salary ranges. Also learn about the company, its competition and the industry. Then think about what you want from the job, both in terms of salary and benefits, as well as opportunity and upward mobility, Pinkley says. This information will become valuable during the interview and salary negotiation.
  • Don't Talk Turkey Too Early: "You never win by talking about money early on," says Lee Miller, author of Up: Influence, Power and the U Perspective -- The Art of Getting What You Want. "The time to talk about money is when they've fallen in love with you." Before that, you're just one of many easily dismissed candidates. But once the employer has decided you're right for the job, "it becomes an issue of, ‘how are we going to make this happen?'" Miller says.
  • Avoid the Salary Requirements Trap: Pinkley tells people to say: "I completely understand why this is an important issue -- you're trying to determine who you want to continue in this process, and it doesn't make much sense to pursue candidates you aren't going to get. Secondly, I know that the tendency is for people to lowball their salary range, because they don't want to get out of the pool. My preference is to figure out, independent of these issues, the degree to which there is a good fit here and the extent to which I can bring value to this organization and the extent to which I'm going to be fulfilled and involved and committed to this position. I suggest we wait to have the salary conversation until you're prepared to make an offer."
    If they still want a number, leverage your research to talk industry-standard ranges, not specific numbers.
At Time of Offer
  • Strike First: Try to mention a specific salary before the employer does. This will start the negotiations in your ballpark. "The whole negotiation is based on that first offer," Pinkley says.
  • Don't Commit Too Quickly: The employer often offers the job and salary simultaneously. Never say yes right away -- even if you like the offer. "I would always come back and try to get more," Pinkley says. Tell them you'll give them an answer within a certain time frame.
  • Make Them Jealous: If you've been interviewing for other jobs, call those prospective employers, tell them about your offer, and see if they can speed up the interview process -- or make you an offer. Knowing you have another offer will make you more attractive to them.
    When it's time to answer the first employer, mention the other employers' interest to help boost your value. But don't make up offers. It's easy to check, and the interest alone will help you look good.
  • Articulate Your Expectations: Tell the employer what you want from the job, in terms of salary, benefits and opportunity. "It may be time off, flexibility about where you work, autonomy or ownership over a particular area, it may be your title -- whatever has a perceived value to you," says Joyce Gioia, president of the Herman Group, a think tank of management consultants and futurists.
  • Negotiate Extras: If the employer can't offer you the salary you want, think about other valuable options that might not cost as much. Miller always recommends asking for education, which can make a big difference in your long-term marketability.
  • Quantify Your Value and Performance: Mention your value in quantifiable terms, such as how much money you saved your company and how your projects increased revenues by X thousands of dollars, Gioia says. Then tell them specifically how valuable you expect to be in your new job.
You also can add a few contingencies showing your confidence in your performance. You could ask the employer to give you a salary review after six months rather than a year or for a year-end bonus if you make a certain amount of money. "It shows that you believe in yourself and are committed to bringing what you say you can do," Pinkley says. "You believe you are going to bring significant value to the organization.

February 9, 2013

Important links for websites and blogs!!

#Site Web LinkAuthor
1James Bach's BlogJames Bach
2Testing at the Edge of ChaosMatt Heusser
3Agile TestingGrig Gheorghiu
4Martinfowler.comMartin Fowler
5Tester Tested!Pradeep Soundararajan
6Testing BlogGoogle Testing
7Cem Kaner’s BlogCem Kaner
8Miško HeveryMiško Hevery
9DevelopSenseMichael Bolton
10Sara Ford's WeblogSara Ford
11Steve Rowe's BlogSteve Rowe
12Test ObsessedElisabeth Hendrickson
13Software Quality Insights( various )
14Exploration Through ExampleBrian Marick
15Gojko AdzicGojko Adzic
16Thinking TesterShrini Kulkarni
17Chris McMahon's BlogChris McMahon
18JW on TestJames Whittaker
19Software testing helpVijay
20Corey GoldbergCorey Goldberg
21Quality FrogBen Simo
22Testing Hotlist UpdateBret Pettichord
23AbakasCatherine Powell
24Collaborative Software TestingJonathan Kohl
25Sbarber's blogScott Barber
26Adam goucherAdam goucher
27Eric JarviEric Jarvi
28Karen N. Johnson's blogKaren N. Johnson
29Test GuideMichael Hunter
30Curious TesterParimala Shankaraiah
31Testy RedheadLanette Creamer
32Antony Marcano's blogAntony Marcano
33All Things QualityJoe Strazzere
34I. M. TestyBj Rollinson
35Software testing zoneDebasis Pradhan
36PractiTest QA BlogJoel Montvelisky
37Practical QALinda Wilkinson
38Marlena’s BlogMarlena Compton
39Software Testing and moreEwald Roodenrijs, Andréas Prins
40patrickwilsonwelsh.comPatrick Wilson-Welsh
41Quality Assurance and Software Testing( various )
42Testing Testing 1,2,3Chan Chaiyochlarb
43Mike Kelly's blog
Mike Kelly
44Test this BlogEric Jacobson
45Enjoy testingAjay Balamurugadas
46Evil TesterAlan Richardson
47Tooth of the WeaselAlan Page
48Charlie Audritsh's blogCharlie Audritsh
49Maverick TesterAnne-Marie Charrett
50Paul Gerrard's blogPaul Gerrard
51shino.deMarkus Gaertner
52Cartoon TesterAndy Glover
53cLabs BlogkiChris Morris
54Jeff Fry on TestingJeff Fry
55Venkat's BlogVenkat Reddy Chintalapudi
56Agile Testing and Process ThoughtsJanet Gregory
57Software Testing Stuff( various )
58selenadelesie.comSelena Delesie
59Software SleuthingJosh Poley
60The Software Quality BlogVijay Bhaskar
61Expected ResultsPhil Kirkham
62One of the wolvesTim Coulter
63Musing about Software TestingKeith Stobie
64Jon Bach's blogJonathan Bach
65Quardev( various )
66Software Testing Club Blog( various )
67TestToTesterSharath Byregowda
68Agile Testing with Lisa CrispinLisa Crispin
69Confessions of a Passionate TesterDawn Cannan
70I am filled with solutionsDustin Andrews
71Software TastingGeordie Keitt
72Rosie LandRosie Sherry
73Still LifeSteve Swanson
74Brian OsmanBrian Osman
75Dhanasekar S’s BlogDhanasekar S
76The Social TesterRob Lambert
77QA InsightBrent Strange
78The Testing Blog( various )
79TestingmindedSteven Machtelinckx
80John McConda's blogJohn McConda
81Software TestingLen DiMaggio
82Jeroen's world of Software TestingJeroen Rosink
83TestingPerspectiveRahul Verma
84Adam WhiteAdam White

85Purple Box TestingTrish Khoo
86Lessons Learned by a Software TesterPaul Carvalho
87Pliant AllianceTim Beck
88TestjutsuBen Kelly
89IlliterationJared Quinert
90Tester TestifiesRaj Kamal
91Santhosh Tuppad's BlogSanthosh Tuppad
92TeknologikaBruce McLeod
93Creative TesterAnuj Magazine
94Tester TroublesRay Claridge
95Thoughts on QA and EngineeringJohn Overbaugh
96Quick Testing Tips( various )
97Cruisin QABrett Leonard
98QA Hates YouThe Director
99Tester Lost FocusMichelle Smith
100James McCaffrey's blogJames McCaffrey

 101  Brett Pettichord                                  Brett Pettichord



Google: Android has security flaw


A security flaw has made it easy for scam artists to send phony text messages to Android phones with help of a security flaw, a report has said.

In late October, researchers at North Carolina State University alerted Google to a practice called "smishing" that can ensnare consumers in fraud. 

Google's security officials confirmed the flaw and promising to correct it. 

Within days they had incorporated a fix into the latest version of the Android operating system, Jelly Bean 4.2, and made available a security update for earlier versions. 

But for most Android phones, the fix never arrived, and for many, it never will, the Washington Post reports. 

That is because it is not clear which company, Google, the smartphone maker or the wireless carrier that sells it, bears ultimate responsibility for the costly process of getting security updates to an Android device. 

According to the paper, fixes to known security flaws can take many months to reach individual smartphones, if they arrive at all. 

Security experts said that the problem has contributed to making the world's most popular mobile operating system more vulnerable than its rivals to hackers, scam artists and a growing universe of malicious software. 

Breaches remain more common on traditional computers than on smartphones, which have been engineered to include security features not found on desktop or laptop machines, experts added. 

The report pointed out that if there was a major outbreak of malicious software, the fractured nature of the system for delivering updates could dramatically slow efforts to protect information carried on Android phones, including documents, passwords, contact lists, pictures, videos, location data and credit card numbers.

February 1, 2013

Myths and Facts about Software Testing...




- Software Testing can not show the absence of errors


- There is no last bug in the software / application


- Maximum coverage through minimum test cases is a big challenge of testing.


- Even for simple program of loops, there can be over million paths – testable manually in million years. Domain of possible inputs is too large to test. Also, there are too many possible paths to test the program. Even if, theoretically speaking, one could design excellent test cases to detect all defects, does one have the luxury of time and resources to do so in practice?


- Preventive testing is very important. Verify documents, design, code at each stage of development to prevent errors from getting in. Use a variety of techniques for this. Code review itself throughs up many defects that may be too difficult to detect by execution of tests. On the other hand, test execution can detect errors that can not be easily detected by code reviews. Therefore, various techniques are complimentary in nature and it is only through their combined use that one can hope to detect most errors.


- Even though development tends to be given more importance than testing. A good test design is perhaps intellectually more challenging than the software design and development. Given reasonable practical limits to the quality of test design in practice, it is easy to understand that why it is difficult to uncover all defects through testing.

       

Source


Software Testing Myths & Facts



There are certain popular myths about the testing discipline which are deep rooted in the software development community. Over the years, with several major products shipped on time, with high quality helping keep the software maintenance costs within predicted and manageable numbers are helping shatter these myths.

Testing Myths & Facts
Herein we list some of those myths we’ve heard time and again and the facts associated with them that we really believe in:

Myth: Initiating testing activities earlier in the development cycle increases delivery time while reducing the number of features in the product.
Reality: Testing is not the time-consuming activity in a development lifecycle. Diagnosing and fixing defects are the time-consuming, bottleneck activities.

Myth: You can't test if you don't have a product to test.
Reality: Iterative testing isn't limited to testing code.

Myth: Continually regressing everything every time we change code is tedious and time consuming…but, in an ideal world, it should be done.
Reality: Regression testing doesn't mean "testing everything, every time."
Iterative regression testing means testing what makes sense in each phase and iteration. It also means modifying our coverage based on the impact of the change, the history of the product, and the previous test results.

Myth: It's not a bug -- the feature is working as designed.
Reality:The over-explanation of why the product is doing what it's doing is a common trap. Sometimes we just know too much. When defects are triaged and reviewed, we often explain away the reasons for the defect. Sometimes we tag defects as "works as designed" or "no plans to fix" because the application is actually working as it was designed, and it would be too costly or risky to make the design change. Similarly, we explain many usability concerns as "it's an external component" or "it's a bell and whistle." Our widgets or UI controls may have known limitations. Or we may even tell ourselves that "once the user learns to do it this way, they'll be fine."

Myth: A tester's only task is to find bugs.
Reality: This view of the tester's role is very limited and adds no value for the customer. Testers are experts with the system, application, or product under test. Unlike the developers, who are responsible for a specific function or component, the tester understands how the system works as a whole to accomplish customer goals. Testers understand the value added by the product, the impact of the environment on the product's efficiency, and the best ways to get the most out of the product.

Myth: We don't have enough resources or time to fully test the product.
Reality: You don't need to fully test the product -- you need to test the product sufficiently to reduce the risk that a customer will be negatively affected.

Myth: Testing should take place in a controlled environment.
Reality: The more the test environment resembles the final production environment, the more reliable the testing. If the customer's environment is very controlled, then you can do all your testing in a controlled environment. But if the final production environment is not controlled, then conducting 100 percent of your testing in a controlled environment will cause you to miss some important test cases.


   
source